Evaluasi program merdeka belajar dengan model CIPP dan kirkpatrick sebagai aktualiasi keberlanjutan program menjadi kampus berdampak

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi efektivitas Program Merdeka Belajar yang diterapkan di Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Jambi dengan menggunakan dua pendekatan evaluasi, yaitu model CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) dan model Kirkpatrick (Reaction, Learning, Behavior, Results). Model CIPP digunakan untuk mengevaluasi perencanaan dan pelaksanaan program dari segi konteks, sumber daya, proses, dan hasil, sedangkan model Kirkpatrick digunakan untuk mengukur dampak program terhadap peserta didik dan pendidik dari sudut pandang pengalaman, pengetahuan, perubahan perilaku, dan hasil akhir. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah deskriptif kualitatif melalui analisis berbasis teks, yang disebut analisis tekstual terhadap berbagai laporan, dokumen resmi, pedoman, dan prosedur dengan teknik pengumpulan data melalui observasi, wawancara, dan dokumentasi. Hasil evaluasi menunjukkan bahwa secara umum program Merdeka Belajar telah memberikan dampak positif, terutama dalam meningkatkan fleksibilitas pembelajaran dan kemandirian. Namun, ditemukan pula beberapa tantangan, seperti kurangnya pemahaman menyeluruh terhadap konsep Merdeka Belajar di tingkat implementasi serta keterbatasan sumber daya di beberapa sekolah. Temuan ini diharapkan dapat menjadi masukan strategis bagi pembuat kebijakan dalam menyempurnakan pelaksanaan program sebagai aktualisasi transformasi program menjadi kampus berdampak.

Keywords
  • Merdeka belajar
  • Evaluasi program
  • Model CIPP
  • Model kirkpatrick
Lisensing Information
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References
  1. Adam, A., Sebe, K. M., Limatahu, K., & Jaohar, Y. (2023). Program Evaluation of Independent Campus Learning Program (MBKM) in IAIN Ternate Kirkpatrick Model. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 6(2), 170–176. https://doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v6i2.234
  2. Ampauleng Zainuddin, S. M. M. N. A. R. (2023). Implementasi Evaluasi Model Kirkpatrick pada Pelatihan Pemanfaatan Digitalisasi Pada Perpustakaan UPT IAIN Sultan Amai Gorontalo. 140–152.
  3. Anwar, S. E. (2022). Komparasi penerapan kurikulum merdeka dan k-13 di SMA Abdussalam. In JPDSH Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Sosial Humaniora (Vol. 2, Issue 1). https://bajangjournal.com/index.php/JPDSH
  4. Arief, I., Tanzil Multazam, M., Zainudin, A., Anwar Dani, A., Candra Yusro, A., Rahman Nur, D., Alan Deta, U., Pramudya Laksana, E., Fuad Saifuddin, M., Fauziddin, M., Ratodi, M., Erlan Maulana, A., Firyal Akbar, M., Zamzami, L., & Rialdy Atmadja, A. (2024). Transformasi Perguruan Tinggi: Strategi dan Teknik Mewujudkan Universitas Berkelas Dunia. Aaministrasi Dan Manajemen Pendidikan, 7(2). http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jamp/
  5. Arpizal, A., Putra, I., Sari, N., Dwijayanti, N. S., & Nasori, A. (2023). Measuring of main performance indicators of IKU-EKO UNJA Smart at IKU 2 students get off-campus experience through academic scorecards. JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia), 9(2), 643. https://doi.org/10.29210/020232304
  6. Awaliyah, D. F., Wardati, K., Fatimah, S., Futhona, A. K., & Chasanah, S. I. U. (2023). Supporting Akreditasi LAM Teknik: Evaluasi Implementasi MBKM di Fakultas Saintek UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta. Media Penelitian Pendidikan : Jurnal Penelitian Dalam Bidang Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 17(1), 179–185. https://doi.org/10.26877/mpp.v17i1.14311
  7. Azhari, A., Irwandi, I., Jalil, Z., Ilhamsyah, Y., Sulastri, S., Muhibuddin, M., & Rasul, M. S. (2023). Integration Merdeka Belajar concept in development STEMC module for electrochemical and renewable energy at vocational school SMK SMTI Banda Aceh. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2596(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2596/1/012076
  8. Bejan, A. S., Damian, R. M., Leiber, T., Neuner, I., Niculita, L., & Vacareanu, R. (2018). Impact evaluation of institutional evaluation and programme accreditation at Technical University of Civil Engineering Bucharest (Romania). European Journal of Higher Education, 8(3), 319–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2018.1474780
  9. Dalimunthe, M. B. (2022). Kirkpatrick Four-level Model Evaluation: An Evaluation Scale on the Preservice Teacher’s Internship Program. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 6(2), 367–376. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v6i2.43535
  10. Devi Arisuryami, N. D. I. G. S. (2019). Studi Evaluatif Berbasis Model Cse-Ucla Tentang Efektivitas Implementasi Program Gender Mainstreaming Melalui Pemberdayaan Polwan Pada Bidang Opsnal Polri Di Polres Buleleng (Vol. 9, Issue 1).
  11. Elizabeth A Farmer, G. P. (2025). A practical guide to assessing clinical decision-making skills using the key features approach. Medical Education, 39(12), 1188–1194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02339.x
  12. Englund, H., Stockhult, H., Du Rietz, S., Nilsson, A., & Wennblom, G. (2023). Learning-Environment Uncertainty and Students’ Approaches to Learning: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 67(4), 559–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2022.2042734
  13. Gates, E., & Dyson, L. (2017). Implications of the Changing Conversation About Causality for Evaluators. American Journal of Evaluation, 38(1), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214016644068
  14. Gibbs, P., Grdzelidze, I., & Sanikidze, T. (2025). A preliminary study on the reality of autonomy in Georgian universities. Higher Education Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2025.2456846
  15. Hinton-Smith, T., Marvell, R., Morris, C., & Brayson, K. (2022). ‘It’s not something that we think about with regard to curriculum.’ Exploring gender and equality awareness in higher education curriculum and pedagogy. Gender and Education, 34(5), 495–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2021.1947472
  16. Indrawan, D., & Jalilah, S. R. (2021). Metode Kombinasi/Campuran Bentuk Integrasi Dalam Penelitian. Jurnal Studi Guru Dan Pembelajaran, 4(3), 735–739. https://doi.org/10.30605/jsgp.4.3.2021.1452
  17. John W Creswell, J. D. C. (2018). Reseach Desain.Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mix Metods Approachs.
  18. Kafi, Z., Motallebzadeh, K., Khodabakhshzadeh, H., & Zeraatpisheh, M. (2019). Developing, glocalizing & validating a quality indices rubric in English language teaching: A case of CIPP, CSE-UCLA, KIRKPATRICK model. Cogent Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1666643
  19. Kwet, M., & Prinsloo, P. (2020). The ‘smart’ classroom: a new frontier in the age of the smart university. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(4), 510–526. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1734922
  20. Kemendikbudristek. (2020). Buku Panduan Merdeka Belajar-Kampus Merdeka.
  21. Kholifaturrohmah, R., & Hindrayani, A. (2024). Economic Education Analysis Journal SINTA 3 Accredited Evaluation of the MBKM Educational Internship Program and Flipped Classroom Oriented to the CIPP Model. EEAJ, 13(1), 58–75. https://doi.org/10.15294/eeaj.v13i1.1113
  22. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (2021). Situated Learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. In Situated Learning. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511815355
  23. Leiber, T., Stensaker, B., & Harvey, L. C. (2018). Bridging theory and practice of impact evaluation of quality management in higher education institutions: a SWOT analysis. European Journal of Higher Education, 8(3), 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2018.1474782
  24. Lederberg, A. R., Branum-Martin, L., Webb, M. Y., Schick, B., Antia, S., Easterbrooks, S. R., & Connor, C. M. D. (2019). Modality and Interrelations Among Language, Reading, Spoken Phonological Awareness, and Fingerspelling. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 24(4), 408–423. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enz011
  25. Lamada, M., & Karim, S. A. (2024). Evaluasi Pelaksanaan MBKM Jurusan Teknik Informatika dan Komputer Fakultas Teknik Universitas Negeri Makassar. 7(1).
  26. Little, D. (2015). Guiding and modelling quality improvement in higher education institutions. Quality in Higher Education, 21(3), 312–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2015.1111008
  27. MBKM. (2021). Diterbitkan oleh: Merdeka Belajar-Kampus Merdeka (MBKM).
  28. Meisarah Asril, C., & Lamada, M. (2023). Evaluasi Program Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka (MBKM) Menggunakan Model CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product). 6(1). https://mbkm.unm.ac.id/
  29. Montes-Martínez, R., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2023). Pedagogical models and ICT integration in entrepreneurship education: Literature review. In Cogent Education (Vol. 10, Issue 2). Taylor and Francis Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2264026
  30. Morris, C., Hinton-Smith, T., Marvell, R., & Brayson, K. (2022). Gender back on the agenda in higher education: perspectives of academic staff in a contemporary UK case study. Journal of Gender Studies, 31(1), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2021.1952064
  31. Martono, H. H., Tiyanto, D., & Surwati, C. H. D. (2018). Teaching journalism ethics: An evaluative study on teaching model effectiveness. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2018.1498163
  32. Mousavi, M., Atai, M. R., & Babaii, E. (2016). Chabahar Maritime University Iranian Journal of English for Academic Purposes Exploring Standards and Developing a Measure for Evaluating Iranian EFL Teachers’ Professional Competence in the Private Sector. IJEAP, 5(2).
  33. Muhammad Taufiqurrahman, D. B. S. A. F. H. (2022). Penggunaan model cipp (context, input, process, dan product) dalam evaluasi program asistensi mengajar di TK Miftakhul Jannah. 11.
  34. Nurfadhilah, M. Y. M. , R. T. M. (2024). Evaluasi implementasi kurikulum merdeka menggunakan model CIPP DI SMK Laniang Makassar. UNM of Journal Technologycal, 8(3).
  35. Pabbajah, M., Abdullah, I., Widyanti, R. N., Jubba, H., & Alim, N. (2020). Student demoralization in education:The industrialization of university curriculum in 4.0.Era Indonesia. Cogent Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1779506
  36. Paquita, A. R., & Yusuf Sobri, A. (2023). Evaluasi Program Kampus Mengajar dengan Model Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP). JAMP: Jurnal Administrasi Dan Manajemen Pendidikan, 6, 247–262. http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jamp/
  37. Richard H. Derrah, P. M. C. K. B. (2022). Shifting Fields: Japanese University Students’ Habitus During the COVID-19 Pandemic. In Navigating Precarity in Educational Contexts.
  38. Rink, J. E. (2023). Measuring teacher effectiveness in physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 84(4), 407–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2013.844018
  39. Rosmiati, P. I., Dwijayanti, N. S., Sari, N., & Nasori, A. (2025). Indonesian Institute for Counseling, Education and Therapy View of an evaluation framework for legal entity state universities in indonesia: integration and measuring institusional effectiveness Publication details, including author guidelines. Jurnal Konseling Dan Pendidikan, 13. https://doi.org/10.29210/1148600
  40. Silviariza, W. Y., Sumarmi, Utaya, S., Bachri, S., & Handoyo, B. (2023). Development of Evaluation Instruments to Measure the Quality of Spatial Problem Based Learning (SPBL): CIPP Framework. In International Journal of Instruction (Vol. 16, Issue 2, pp. 413–436). Gate Association for Teaching and Education. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16223a
  41. SKPI UNJA. (2025). Selamat Datang di Sistem Informasi Surat Keterangan Pendamping Ijazah.
  42. Steinert, C. V., & Ruggeri, A. (2020). Who are Our Experts? Predictors of Participation in Expert Surveys. Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy, 26(4). https://doi.org/10.1515/peps-2020-0007
  43. Simon McGrath. (2018). Education and Development.
  44. Valks, B., Arkesteijn, M. H., Den Heijer, A. C., & Vande Putte, H. J. M. (2018). Smart campus tools – adding value to the university campus by measuring space use real-time. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 20(2), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-03-2017-0006
  45. Wang, C., Zhang, M., Sesunan, A., & Yolanda, L. (2023). Peran teknologi dalam transformasi pendidikan di Indonesia Tinjauan dampak terkini gerakan Merdeka Belajar.
  46. Xiaozhou Xu. (2022). The Structural VPR Model for the Evaluation of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education. The Structural VPR Model for the Evaluation of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education. Chinese Education & Society.
  47. Zhenqiu Shu, K. Y. D. L. Z. J. Y. Z. Y. &Xiao-J. W. (2022). Robust supervised matrix factorization hashing with application to cross-modal retrieval. 6665–6684. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00521-022-08006-6

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 19 times
PDF
: 4 times