Analysis of digital transformation of public administration in improving the effectiveness of government services in Indonesia

  • Sigit Wahyudi 
    Universitas Waskita Dharma
    Indonesia
  • Aldian Yusup
    Institut Prima Bangsa
    Indonesia
  • Muhammad Rizki Perdana
    IKMI College of Informatics and Computer Management
    Indonesia

Abstract

Digital transformation has become a central pillar in reshaping public administration systems worldwide, including in Indonesia, where government institutions are increasingly adopting digital platforms to enhance service quality. Despite strong national policies such as the Electronic-Based Government System (SPBE), significant gaps remain between regulatory frameworks and practical implementation at central and local levels. This study aims to analyze how digital transformation has influenced the effectiveness of government services in Indonesia by examining implementation patterns, enabling factors, persistent barriers, and societal impacts. Using a qualitative literature review approach, the research synthesizes peer-reviewed studies, government documents, and international reports to identify trends in system integration, human resource capacity, technological infrastructure, and governance readiness. The findings reveal that digital transformation has improved service speed, transparency, and citizen experience, as demonstrated in systems such as OSS-RBA, SIPD, and Jakarta’s JAKI application. However, these benefits are uneven due to interoperability issues, inadequate digital competencies among civil servants, fragmented infrastructure, cybersecurity vulnerabilities, and regional budget disparities. Case evidence shows that successful digitalization occurs when strong policy frameworks are supported by institutional commitment, aligned regulations, robust infrastructure, and user-centered service design. Conversely, misaligned legal procedures, partial system adoption, and organizational resistance hinder effectiveness. This study concludes that Indonesia’s digital governance progress is promising yet incomplete, requiring stronger integration, capacity building, and equitable infrastructure development. The analysis contributes to a deeper understanding of how digital transformation can be strategically strengthened to support efficient, transparent, and citizen-centric public administration.

Keywords
  • Digital Transformation
  • Public Administration
  • Government Services
Lisensing Information
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References
  1. Afrizal, A., Munaf, Y., Yogia, M. A., Suri, D. M., Prayuda, R., & Amri, P. (2023). Government-Owned Digital Services to Overcome the Spread of COVID-19, Case in Indonesia. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 15(5), 1553–1563.
  2. Anderson, D., Wu, R., Cho, J.-S., & Schroeder, K. (2015). E-government strategy, ICT and innovation for citizen engagement. Springer.
  3. Anthopoulos, L. G. (2017). Understanding smart cities: A tool for smart government or an industrial trick? (Vol. 22). Springer.
  4. APJII. (2024). Internet Indonesia. Survei Penetrasi Internet Indonesia, 1–73.
  5. Bahagia, S. I., Amirulloh, M. R., & Mulyadi, A. (2025). Evaluating the implementation of an electronic-based government system: A lesson from Sukabumi District. Publisia: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 10(1), 10–22.
  6. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.
  7. Chatfield, A. T., & Reddick, C. G. (2016). Smart city implementation through shared vision of social innovation for environmental sustainability: A case study of Kitakyushu, Japan. Social Science Computer Review, 34(6), 757–773.
  8. Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297–298.
  9. Cordella, A., & Tempini, N. (2015). E-government and organizational change: Reappraising the role of ICT and bureaucracy in public service delivery. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 279–286.
  10. Corydon, B., Ganesan, V., & Lundqvist, M. (2016). Transforming government through digitization.
  11. Criado, J. I., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2019). Creating public value through smart technologies and strategies: From digital services to artificial intelligence and beyond. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 32(5), 438–450.
  12. Cullen, R. (2015). Defining the transformation of government. E-Government: Information, Technology, and Transformation: Information, Technology, and Transformation, 52.
  13. Danar, O. R. (2024). Digital transformation of Indonesian administration and bureaucratic system. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 16(2), 152–171.
  14. Duri, R., Hidayat, B. A., & Sinaga, R. D. (2024). Efektivitas Online Single Submission Risk Based Approach (OSS RBA): Inovasi Perizinan Usaha Mikro Kecil di Perkotaan. Matra Pembaruan: Jurnal Inovasi Kebijakan, 8(2), 103–116.
  15. Gil-Garcia, J. R., Zhang, J., & Puron-Cid, G. (2016). Conceptualizing smartness in government: An integrative and multi-dimensional view. Government Information Quarterly, 33(3), 524–534.
  16. Gunawan, H., Alfitri, A., Lionardo, A., Thamrin, M. H., & Adam, R. (2025). Digitalization of Licensing Services Through OSS-RBA as a Modern Governance Innovation in Lubuk Linggau City. Eduvest-Journal of Universal Studies, 5(11), 13313–13328.
  17. Hermana, B., & Silfianti, W. (2011). Evaluating e-government implementation by local government: digital divide in internet based public services in Indonesia. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(3).
  18. Ismail, I., Fathonih, A., Prabowo, H., Hartati, S., & Redjeki, F. (2020). Transparency and corruption: does e-government effective to combat corruption? International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(4), 5396–5404.
  19. Janssen, M., & van der Voort, H. G. (2020). Agile and adaptive governance in crisis response.
  20. Karundeng, A. B., Kaawoan, J. E., & Pangemanan, S. E. (2021). Implementasi Kebijakan Sistem Informasi Pemerintahan Daerah (Sipd) Di Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Daerah Kabupaten Kepulauan Siau Tagulandang Biaro. Governance, 1(2).
  21. Kusmiarto, K., Aditya, T., Djurdjani, D., & Subaryono, S. (2021). Digital transformation of land services in indonesia: A readiness assessment. Land, 10(2), 120.
  22. Ma’ruf, S. (2024). CRISIS MANAGEMENT AND INCIDENT RESPONSE: A NATIONAL DATA CENTER CASE STUDY. Jurnal Intelek Dan Cendikiawan Nusantara, 1(3), 4619–4633.
  23. Maktub, M. A.-K., Handayani, P. W., & Sunarso, F. P. (2025). Citizen acceptance and use of the Jakarta Kini (JAKI) e-government: Extended unified model for electronic government adoption. Heliyon, 11(2).
  24. Maria, E., & Halim, A. (2021). E-government dan korupsi: studi di pemerintah daerah, indonesia dari perspektif teori keagenan. EKUITAS (Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan), 5(1), 40–58.
  25. Miles, H., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. New York: Sage Publications, Inc.
  26. Mountasser, T., & Abdellatif, M. (2023). Digital transformation in public administration: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Professional Business Review: Int. J. Prof. Bus. Rev., 8(10), 1.
  27. Nugroho, R. A., & Purbokusumo, Y. (2020). E-Government Readiness: Penilaian Kesiapan Aktor Utama Penerapan E-Government di Indonesia (E-Government Readiness: Main Actor Readiness Assessment for E-Government Application in Indonesia). JURNAL IPTEKKOM Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan & Teknologi Informasi, 22(1), 1–17.
  28. Riani, N. W., Wijaya, K. A. S., Yudartha, I. P. D., & Savitri, R. (2024). Analysis of Public Service Innovation Based on JAKI Application in Realizing the New Public Service. JPAS (Journal of Public Administration Studies), 9(1), 57–66.
  29. Sabani, A., Deng, H., & Thai, V. (2019). Evaluating the development of E-government in Indonesia. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Software Engineering and Information Management, 254–258.
  30. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.
  31. Srivastava, A., Narang, A., Arora, S. V., Johri, M., Thakur, S. S., Sharma, K., Mathur, S., & Rathore, A. S. (2025). Digital Transformation In Public Administration: Policy, Governance, And Social Implications. Vascular and Endovascular Review, 8(14s), 104–112.
  32. Sundari, W., & Sartika, I. (2025). Advancing Public Service Quality through Indonesia’s Electronic-Based Government System. Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia (JIM-ID), 4(8), 902–911.
  33. Wagola, R., Nurmandi, A., Misran, & Subekti, D. (2023). Government Digital Transformation in Indonesia. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 286–296.
  34. Wahyunengseh, R. D., Hastjarjo, S., Mulyaningsih, T., & Suharto, D. G. (2020). Digital Governance and Digital Divide: A Matrix of the Poor’s Vulnerabilities. Policy & Governance Review, 4(2), 152–166.
  35. Wirtz, B. W., Müller, W. M., & Schmidt, F. W. (2021). Digital public services in smart cities–An empirical analysis of lead user preferences. Public Organization Review, 21(2), 299–315.
  36. Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., & Geyer, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence and the public sector—applications and challenges. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(7), 596–615.
  37. Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112.
  38. Zahara, A., Kabullah, M. I., & Putera, R. E. (2023). Effectiveness of the OSSRBA (Online Single Submission Risk Based Approach) System in Business Licensing Services in Payakumbuh City DPMPTSP. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekotrans & Erudisi, 3(2), 22–40.

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 5 times
PDF
: 0 times